karl maenz |
|
|
|
paintings of the spirit within me |
|
|
|
mandala improvisations (2007) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
In Tibetan Buddhism, a mandala is an imaginary palace that is contemplated during meditation. This series starts with the original theme in mind.
|
|
| |
|
tibetan mandala |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
As in music, improvisations will wander far from the original theme, and become more or less independent and self-contained. The abstract expressionist (abex) Sam Francis' mandala series is perhaps my favorite of the many modernist improvisations on the theme. Here is an example. |
|
| |
|
sam francis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In m 1, I was still almost totally in the spirit of all-over automatic abex, except for the square design and white rim. The result was fresh and spontaneous, though a Tibetan monk might accuse me of blasphemy.
|
|
|
|
m 1 |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
m 2 is a beautiful mandala: a red, blue and gold "palace" surrounded by two gardens of beautiful abstract flowers. It's very romantic, love this picture. But - did I wish to paint romantic mandalas - where is the intuitive side of my character? |
|
| |
|
m 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In m 4, the "intuitive" takes over completely, actually covers an original dark-blue square design. The circular movement, in shades of silver, gold and various light blue-turquoise strokes, exudes beauty and spirituality. Mounted on a large brushed aluminium plate, it's one of my favorite paintings. |
|
| |
|
m 4 |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
m 5 borrows from the blue-gold look of m 4 and combines it again with the "mandala" squares. Its center is a structured golden palace with a crimson interior. Probably my most decorative painting, currently mounted on a large frame of weathered larch, painted white. |
|
| |
|
m 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m 6 and m 8 are inspired by Islamic ornamental art, and I have rearranged and re-colored the geometric elements for a modernist look. All traces of automatism have disappeared, but in an inexplicable way, I feel touched. |
|
| |
m 6 |
m 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m 7, m 9 and m 10 revert in part to automatism, and combine it with geometrics. Here the two approaches compete to create an interesting tension. Two paintings in one?
| |
| m 7 |
m 9 |
m 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Quo vadis ? |
|
An interesting ride so far. At first sight, m 10 seemed more decorative, less intuitive than others. But as time goes by, I feel very attracted to it: its puzzling composition, its opposites of monochromes vs. patterns, hard-edge rigor vs. automatic painting, its various shades of light grey, the larger canvas size (100x100 cm) ...
Please stay tuned.
|
|
|